Sonny Iroche explains that before adopting AI, NGOs must assess their AI readiness at the board level. ‘In Oxford, we developed the 4C model:
- The first C is Constituents: The board, directors and managers must be committed to AI adoption. Staff must understand that AI won’t replace jobs, but those who learn AI will thrive.
- The second C is Capabilities: It’s important to assess whether staff have the skills to use AI effectively. Training programmes are crucial to addressing fears about job displacement.
- The third C is Competence: It is crucial to evaluate the level of skill within the staff regarding the effective use of AI tools and systems.
- The fourth C is Culture: The organisational culture should be considered—whether it’s mainly paper-based or ready for the digital transformation needed for AI integration.
When assessing an NGO’s AI readiness, the first step is agreeing on the need to prepare for AI adoption. Is the NGO large enough to invest in AI, such as banks utilising LLMs (Large Language Models)? Recently, smaller language models have emerged, as the initial focus was on larger models such as neural networks. For instance, my organisation collaborates with Microsoft and always assesses AI readiness before recommending an AI model. Key factors include budget, objectives, geographical coverage (e.g., West or East Africa) and ensuring cultural sensitivity. The NGO must be AI-ready before adoption.
Due to ethical and security risks, the company must adopt an AI policy banning non-business or harmful use. Staff usage will be audited to ensure compliance. As with financial audits, every company should establish an AI policy. In the global North, many firms now appoint Chief AI Officers to oversee ethical AI use.’
How can NGOs build the necessary skills and partnerships to successfully implement AI and data analytics in their initiatives?
‘There are many AI courses available online and some individuals claim to be AI experts, yet generative AI is only three years old,’ notes Sonny Iroche. ‘To be considered an AI professional, certification or oversight by a governing body should be required. In Nigeria, I often hear people say, 'This man gives us lessons in AI,' which is concerning. As a senior fellow, I’ve also completed postgraduate studies in AI, so I recognise the risks of misinformation and incomplete knowledge. It is essential to train people through reputable institutions.
AI isn’t just computer science. Some build the systems while others use them. We didn’t create Office or PowerPoint, but we know how to use them. At Oxford, for example, more than 15 departments focus on AI, including business, mathematics and molecular biology. Training is critical, and partnerships with leading institutions are essential to advancing AI education across regions.’
According to Nadia Virasamy, NPOs must be open-minded about how AI can add value to the sector. ‘Data mining techniques can uncover hidden patterns and correlations within large datasets, offering valuable insights into beneficiary behaviour, programme performance and the effectiveness of various interventions. NPOs collaborating with established research programmes within academic structures or private research entities that share similar datasets could provide valuable insights without a significant financial investment. Additionally, this approach could help reduce community research fatigue.’
‘Strategic partnerships come in when NGOs don’t have the resources for in-house AI expertise,’ states Angélica La Vitola Martino. ‘They need not do everything themselves. Collaborating with universities, tech companies and AI research groups can provide access to expertise, tools and mentorship. Many tech firms offer pro bono AI consulting, grants or discounted software for nonprofits. Partnering with other NGOs that are further along in their AI journey can also be a great way to share knowledge and best practices.
A good starting point is identifying key areas where AI can add value – whether it’s improving decision-making, optimising fundraising or enhancing service delivery. From there, NGOs can begin small by using low-cost or open-source AI tools before scaling up.
AI should always serve the organisation’s core mission rather than becoming a distraction. NGOs should align their AI strategy with their long-term goals and continuously assess whether these technologies are helping to improve impact. Regular feedback from staff, donors and the communities they serve can help ensure that AI remains a tool for empowerment rather than an unnecessary burden.’
Summary
AI and data analytics are no longer optional for NGOs. They’re becoming essential tools for driving meaningful impact in an increasingly complex world. As shown by the insights of three sector leaders, these technologies are helping nonprofits make smarter decisions, improve operations and respond more effectively to crises. But adoption is not without challenges. From ethical concerns and data quality to infrastructure and skills gaps, NGOs must proceed strategically. Building partnerships, investing in training and aligning AI use with mission goals are critical steps toward ensuring that innovation truly serves the communities that need it most.
The Kestria NGO and Not For Profit Practice Group is a crucial ally for organisations transitioning services traditionally managed by governments. With deep industry knowledge, this group addresses the complexities of shifting responsibilities to NGOs and NFPs, which are increasingly vital in tackling global issues across borders. Kestria specialises in identifying social entrepreneurs who deliver innovative solutions and demonstrate tangible returns to stakeholders, thereby enhancing people's lives.